Carbon dating is wrong
Carbon dating is wrong - dating delilah life under the influence
This is at first glance surprising for long-agers, because of the ease with which one would expect helium (with its tiny, light, unreactive atoms) to escape from the spaces within the crystal structure.There should surely be hardly any left, because with such a slow buildup, it should be seeping out continually and not accumulating.
Radiocarbon Every day cosmic rays bombard our atmosphere.Posted: February 18, 2013 in Biology Related, Essays and Papers, Fossil Related, geology related, History Related Tags: ancient, assumption, c14, carbon, carbon14, date, dating, dendrochronology, effect, history, isotope, method, radio, reservoir, rings, tree Radiocarbon dating is a popular dating method the general public is fairly familiar with.Though they may know it as carbon dating or carbon 14 dating, there is an understood notion that when anything old is found, like an ancient artifact, it can be radiocarbon dated to find out exactly how old it is.…Results show that because of all the helium still in the zircons, these crystals (and since this is Precambrian basement granite, by implication the whole earth) could not be older than between 4,000 and 14,000 years.In other words, in only a few thousand years, 1.5 billion years’ worth (at today’s rates) of radioactive decay has taken place” (The new radiocarbon determination places the find to ∼4500 cal BP (∼2500 BCE) contradicting an assumed Palaeolithic age of ∼30,000 years, as originally suggested.
The DNA retrieved from the specimen originates from a male individual who carried mitochondrial DNA of the modern human type.By measuring the amount of uranium and ‘radiogenic lead’ in these crystals, one can calculate that, if the decay rate has been constant, about 1.5 billion years must have passed.(This is consistent with the geologic ‘age’ assigned to the granites in which these zircons are found.) There is a significant amount of helium from that ‘1.5 billion years of decay’ still inside the zircons.Taken together, the results consolidate the fact that the human bone is not associated with the Pleistocene-age deposits of Darra-i-Kur; instead it is intrusive, possibly re-deposited from upper levels dating to much later periods (Neolithic).Despite its Holocene age, the Darra-i-Kur specimen is, so far, the first and only ancient human from Afghanistan whose DNA has been sequenced.Question: "How does radiometric dating fit with the view of a young earth?